IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v35y2005i2p337-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identities of Competitive States in U.S. Presidential Elections: Electoral College Bias or Candidate-Centered Politics?

Author

Listed:
  • Bonnie J. Johnson

Abstract

When discussing the biases of the U.S. Electoral College, researchers conclude that competitive states seem to occur randomly without any explanation. This study examines the consistency with which the same states have been competitive in presidential elections from 1824 to 2000. It also identifies “spectator” states. Spectator states are those that have not been competitive for ten presidential elections in a row. A statistical analysis illustrates that the identities of competitive states have become more unpredictable. In addition, few states have been spectators for long periods. In terms of representation, the facts that competitive states are not consistent and that there are few spectators mean different states are in the presidential spotlight at different times. As opposed to any biases associated with the Electoral College, the changes in consistency coincide with the rise of candidate-centered politics and decreasing voter loyalty to parties. The highly changeable nature of competitive states strengthens the federalism argument for continuation of the Electoral College. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonnie J. Johnson, 2005. "Identities of Competitive States in U.S. Presidential Elections: Electoral College Bias or Candidate-Centered Politics?," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 337-355, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:35:y:2005:i:2:p:337-355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pji017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Cochran & David Curry & Rajesh Radhakrishnan & Jon Pinnell, 2014. "Political engineering: optimizing a U.S. Presidential candidate’s platform," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 215(1), pages 63-87, April.
    2. Wagner, Gary A. & Elder, Erick M., 2021. "Campaigning for retirement: State teacher union campaign contributions and pension generosity," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:35:y:2005:i:2:p:337-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.