IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v32y2016i1p21-40..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economics of health system design

Author

Listed:
  • Peter C. Smith
  • Winnie Yip

Abstract

There has been much rhetoric in global health about the need to consider the health sector as a ‘system’, defined by the World Health Organization as all the activities whose primary purpose is to improve health. The need to adopt a system-wide perspective arises from the complexity of the processes for delivering effective health services, and the important interdependencies between elements of the health system. However, there have hitherto been very few contributions from an economic perspective that explicitly address these issues. This paper argues that an economic paradigm of constrained optimization adapted to the systemic nature of the health sector could provide an analytical and practical approach to policy-makers in assessing their health systems and deriving solutions. The paper therefore discusses the objectives of the health system, the factors that constrain optimization, and the decision variables, in the form of policy levers. Economic approaches that could contribute to the associated research agenda include institutional economics, micro-simulation, and option pricing theory. The important feature of such methods is that they offer the possibility of developing tractable methods for addressing the complexity and interconnectedness of the health system.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter C. Smith & Winnie Yip, 2016. "The economics of health system design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 21-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:21-40.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grv018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine T. Lofgren & David A. Watkins & Solomon T. Memirie & Joshua A. Salomon & Stéphane Verguet, 2021. "Balancing health and financial protection in health benefit package design," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3236-3247, December.
    2. Özlem Karsu & Alec Morton, 2021. "Trading off health and financial protection benefits with multiobjective optimization," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 55-69, January.
    3. Peter Smith, 2020. "Evaluating the Cost-effectiveness of Health System Strengthening: A Platforms Perspective," Seminar Briefing 002245, Office of Health Economics.
    4. Peter S., 2020. "Evaluating the Cost-effectiveness of Health System Strengthening: A Platforms Perspective," Briefings 002245, Office of Health Economics.
    5. Juan Piedra-Peña & Diego Prior, 2023. "Analyzing the effect of health reforms on the efficiency of Ecuadorian public hospitals," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 361-392, September.
    6. Hauck, K. & Morton, A. & Chalkidou, K. & Chi, Y-Ling & Culyer, A. & Levin, C. & Meacock, R. & Over, M. & Thomas, R. & Vassall, A. & Verguet, S. & Smith, P.C., 2019. "How can we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of health system strengthening? A typology and illustrations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 141-149.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:21-40.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.