IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v66y2014i2p557-579..html

Pooling, tranching, and credit expansion

Author

Listed:
  • Spiros Bougheas

Abstract

Traditionally banks have used securitization for expanding credit and thus their profitability. It has been well documented that, at least before the 2008 crisis, many banks were keeping a high proportion of the securities that they created on their own balance sheets. Those securities retained included both the high-risk ‘equity’ tranche and the low-risk AAA-rated tranche. This article builds a simple model of securitization that accounts for the foregoing retention strategies. Banks in the model retained the equity tranche as skin in the game to mitigate moral hazard concerns whilst they post the low-risk tranche as collateral to take advantage of the yield curve. When variations in loan quality are introduced, the predicted retention strategies match well those found in empirical studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Spiros Bougheas, 2014. "Pooling, tranching, and credit expansion," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 66(2), pages 557-579.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:66:y:2014:i:2:p:557-579.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpt029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bougheas, Spiros & Worrall, Tim, 2019. "Portfolio sales and signaling," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 182-191.
    2. Sumit Agarwal & Brent W. Ambrose & Yildiray Yildirim & Jian Zhang, 2024. "Risk Retention Rules and the Issuance of Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(4), pages 684-714, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:66:y:2014:i:2:p:557-579.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.