IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v62y2010i4p803-824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job protection, industrial relations, and employment

Author

Listed:
  • Giulio Piccirilli

Abstract

In a dynamic stochastic union model, we show that firing costs have a small and ambiguous impact on the level of employment if the union precommits to future wages. Further, in comparison with the commitment equilibrium and for very general union preferences, the no commitment equilibrium exhibits higher wages and a lower employment level. We argue that commitment-like equilibria are more likely in bargaining environments that feature social pacts at the aggregate level and cooperative industrial relations. Thus theoretical results suggest that these traits of the bargaining environment interact with employment protection legislation in a way that improves labour market performance. We provide evidence on OECD countries that is consistent with this prediction. Copyright 2010 Oxford University Press 2010 All rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulio Piccirilli, 2010. "Job protection, industrial relations, and employment," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 803-824, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:62:y:2010:i:4:p:803-824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpq005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kjell Erik Lommerud & Odd Rune Straume & Steinar Vagstad, 2018. "Employment Protection and Unemployment Benefits: On Technology Adoption and Job Creation in a Matching Model," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 120(3), pages 763-793, July.
    2. Eguchi, Kyota, 2014. "Employment protection and incentives: Severance pay vs. procedural inconvenience," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 272-290.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:62:y:2010:i:4:p:803-824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.