IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v52y2025i2p330-350..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Diversity Backfires: The Asymmetric Role of Multicultural Diversity on Brand Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Uduehi
  • Julian K Saint Clair
  • Mitchell Hamilton
  • Americus ReedII

Abstract

Brands are expanding their market to new consumers by displaying cultural diversity in marketing campaigns—but the risks are unclear. This article explores the role of the brand’s characteristics in multicultural diversity. Our findings suggest that when brands launch a new multicultural diversity campaign, it may be well-received if the brand’s original focus was on the needs of nonmarginalized consumers. However, for brands with a focus on the needs of marginalized consumers (i.e., marginalized-focused brands), such a campaign may be perceived as selling out, thereby negatively impacting consumers’ reactions. Six studies with Black and White U.S. consumers explore this novel “sellout effect” across various product categories and for consequential behaviors. Inclusion is identified as a key mechanism, mitigation strategies are explored, and implications for theory and practice are discussed. Findings highlight the importance of diversity marketing, understanding marginalization for consumers and brands, and the need for research that considers race and ethnicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Uduehi & Julian K Saint Clair & Mitchell Hamilton & Americus ReedII, 2025. "When Diversity Backfires: The Asymmetric Role of Multicultural Diversity on Brand Perception," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 52(2), pages 330-350.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:330-350.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucae068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:330-350.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.