IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/doi10.1086-661936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Motivational Account of the Question-Behavior Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Anneleen Van Kerckhove
  • Maggie Geuens
  • Iris Vermeir

Abstract

To explain the question-behavior effect, that is, the effect of answering an intention question on subsequent behavior, this article takes on a motivational perspective and proposes that answering an intention question automatically activates an intention. The activation of this motivational state influences subsequent brand choices due to changes in brand accessibilities. Three studies provide support for the assumption that responding to an intention question affects brand choices through a motivational mechanism, such that (1) answering an intention increases the accessibility of motivation-related information and decreases the accessibility of motivation-competing information which increases the choice for the intention-related brand; (2) intention completion temporarily reverses the foregoing accessibility patterns, instigating a reversal of the brand choices for an immediate, second brand choice; and (3) the changes in brand accessibilities and thus the behavioral effect persist as the delay between the intention question and brand choice occasion increases until intention completion.

Suggested Citation

  • Anneleen Van Kerckhove & Maggie Geuens & Iris Vermeir, 2012. "A Motivational Account of the Question-Behavior Effect," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 111-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/661936
    DOI: 10.1086/661936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/661936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/661936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/661936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/661936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.