IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v8y2012i2p417-424..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vertical Theory Of Harm In A Horizontal Merger: The Friesland Foods/Campina Case

Author

Listed:
  • Jurjen J.A. Kamphorst
  • Vitaly Pruzhansky

Abstract

In December 2008, the European Commission (EC) cleared the proposed merger between the two largest dairy cooperatives in the Netherlands. The transaction raised several interesting economic issues that were hotly debated during the EC investigation. In this article, we review the EC's proposed theory of harm relating to the impact of the merger on the market for raw milk in the Netherlands and the ability of the parties' competitors to source raw milk (a critical input) post-merger. We show that the EC's theory is unlikely to be supported by economic theory and facts of the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Jurjen J.A. Kamphorst & Vitaly Pruzhansky, 2012. "Vertical Theory Of Harm In A Horizontal Merger: The Friesland Foods/Campina Case," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 417-424.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:8:y:2012:i:2:p:417-424.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhs009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
    • L42 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Vertical Restraints; Resale Price Maintenance; Quantity Discounts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:8:y:2012:i:2:p:417-424.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.