IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v21y2025i2p210-225..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where is the Limit? Assessing the Potential of Algorithm-Based Cartel Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Hannes Wallimann
  • Solange Emmenegger
  • Marc Pouly
  • Philipp Wegelin

Abstract

Academic research on cartel detection has primary focused on algorithm-based screening of markets. However, only a few studies have assessed the extent to which competition authorities can generalize from a developed model to new markets. In our paper, we aim to fill this gap by investigating how close a market on which an algorithm is trained has to be to detect cartels in a new market. Our results confirm that when comparable training data are available, the machine-learning-based models are powerful tools to flag cartels. However, we show that the algorithms’ performances are limited when lacking comparable training data from the same industry, leading to the conclusion that practitioners should exercise a great deal of caution when choosing training data from different industries for cartel screening. In addition to our main contribution, we present a way of automated feature engineering and selection based on frequently used hand-crafted screens (descriptive statistics derived from firms’ prices) that are generally used in the recent cartel screening literature of algorithm-based cartel detection. Finally, to overcome the prerequisite of any pre-defined screen, we present the first-time application of various recurrent neural network architectures together with raw price data to flag potential cartels.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannes Wallimann & Solange Emmenegger & Marc Pouly & Philipp Wegelin, 2025. "Where is the Limit? Assessing the Potential of Algorithm-Based Cartel Detection," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 210-225.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:210-225.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhae023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General
    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:210-225.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.