IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v19y2024ip339-350..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle analysis (cost and environmental) of different renewable natural gas from waste procedures based on a multivariate decision-making approach: a comprehensive comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mobin Ghasempour
  • Seyedeh Elham Kamali
  • Mohamad Javad Zoqi
  • Fatima Moayad Sami
  • Mohammed Kassim Al-hussainawy
  • Hadi Fooladi

Abstract

This article presents a framework that focuses on structural considerations within gas networks to evaluate and rank various feasibility options for renewable natural gas (RNG) cases. Specifically, the analysis examines and compares a range of methods for producing RNG using natural gas from waste (NGFW), considering different types of waste as feedstock. To analyze and evaluate the different methodologies, the article uses a decision architecture based on life cycle analysis (cost and environmental). These tools are used to determine the most favorable path for the NGFW process. The preferred pathway is identified by considering a range of decision scenarios that take into account variables such as geographical conditions, the availability of various feedstocks and the different stakeholders’ priorities. The results show that according to the economically neutral scenarios and those that favor economic considerations, the pathway involving RNG generation from landfill gas coupled with a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) upgrading technology emerges as the optimum choice. Conversely, in a scenario where environmental sustainability is a priority, the process that emerges as most advantageous is the use of animal manure with the addition of a PSA upgrading unit. The designed structure can be adapted to different regions, each with its own unique geographical features and feedstock resources, and can be customized to meet the varying interests of stakeholders. Based on both parametric assessments and analytical interpretations, this article not only identifies optimal pathways but also provides a set of recommendations and strategies aimed at improving economic behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Mobin Ghasempour & Seyedeh Elham Kamali & Mohamad Javad Zoqi & Fatima Moayad Sami & Mohammed Kassim Al-hussainawy & Hadi Fooladi, 2024. "Life cycle analysis (cost and environmental) of different renewable natural gas from waste procedures based on a multivariate decision-making approach: a comprehensive comparative analysis," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 19, pages 339-350.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:19:y:2024:i::p:339-350.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctae008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:19:y:2024:i::p:339-350.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.