IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022isupplement_2ps138-s147..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slowdown in Mortality Improvement in the Past Decade: A US/UK Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J Murphy
  • Emily M D Grundy

Abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate the slowdown in mortality improvement in the United States, United Kingdom, and comparator countries observed in the first decade of the twenty-first century and critically evaluate proposed explanations.MethodsChange-point analysis to identify the year of change in comparison of national mortality trends and linear spline models in the investigation of subnational differences using data from the Human Mortality Database, Global Burden of Disease cause-specific data, and, for the United Kingdom, national statistics data. Consideration of the impact of using different methods to estimate overall mortality is also concluded together with a review of methodological assumptions made in previous studies.ResultsThe results confirm the slowdown in mortality improvement observed in the early twenty-first century but indicate that proposed explanations for this are inadequate on a range of counts.DiscussionMortality improvement slowed down in the early twenty-first century but the explanations advanced, such as opioid use in the United States or influenza epidemics and austerity programs in the United Kingdom, seem unlikely to account for this. Further research considering longer-term life course and cohort influences is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J Murphy & Emily M D Grundy, 2022. "Slowdown in Mortality Improvement in the Past Decade: A US/UK Comparison," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(Supplemen), pages 138-147.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:supplement_2:p:s138-s147.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab220
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:supplement_2:p:s138-s147.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.