IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i3p571-576..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Engagement Is a Risk-Reducing Factor for Frailty Incidence and Progression

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Trivedy Rogers
  • Daisy Fancourt
  • Shevaun Neupert

Abstract

ObjectivesGiven that frailty is a multifaceted health condition of increasing importance to policy-makers and care providers, it is relevant to consider whether multimodal interventions could provide combined psychophysiological support. As studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of cultural engagement (including visiting museums/theatre/cinema) for many of the components of frailty, this study sought to explore whether community cultural engagement is associated both with a reduced risk of becoming frail and a slower trajectory of frailty progression in older adults.MethodsWe used data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing to measure frequency of cultural engagement and both incident frailty and frailty progression over the following 10 years in 4,575 adults.ResultsOur analyses used competing risks regression models and multilevel growth curve models adjusting for socioeconomic, health behaviors, social confounders, and subthreshold symptoms of frailty. There was a dose–response relationship between increasing frequency of cultural engagement and both incidence and progression of frailty (attendance every few months or more: incidence subhazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63 to 0.996; trajectory coefficient = –0.0039, 95% CI = –0.0059 to –0.0019).DiscussionOlder adults who engaged in cultural activities every few months or more had a reduced risk of becoming frail and a slower progression of frailty over time. Findings are in line with current calls for multimodal, multifactor, community approaches to support health in older age.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Trivedy Rogers & Daisy Fancourt & Shevaun Neupert, 2020. "Cultural Engagement Is a Risk-Reducing Factor for Frailty Incidence and Progression," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(3), pages 571-576.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:3:p:571-576.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jessica K. Bone & Feifei Bu & Jill K. Sonke & Daisy Fancourt, 2024. "Leisure engagement in older age is related to objective and subjective experiences of aging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Change Zhu & Christine Walsh & Lulin Zhou & Xinjie Zhang, 2023. "Latent Classification Analysis of Leisure Activities and Their Impact on ADL, IADL and Cognitive Ability of Older Adults Based on CLHLS (2008–2018)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Rena, Melinda & Fancourt, Daisy & Bu, Feifei & Paul, Elise & Sonke, Jill K. & Bone, Jessica K., 2023. "Receptive and participatory arts engagement and subsequent healthy aging: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    4. Mihaela Ghența & Aniela Matei & Luise Mladen-Macovei & Elen-Silvana Bobârnat, 2022. "Factors Associated with the Participation of Older Adults in Cultural and Sports Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:3:p:571-576.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.