IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i5p785-795..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity of Work and Incident Cognitive Impairment in Puerto Rican Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Ross Andel
  • Ana Luisa Dávila-Roman
  • Catherine Grotz
  • Brent J Small
  • Kyriakos S Markides
  • Michael Crowe

Abstract

ObjectiveWe investigated complexity of work in main occupation in relation to incident cognitive impairment in older Puerto Ricans. Method A population-based sample of 1,673 adults age 60+ for the Puerto Rican Elderly: Health Conditions (PREHCO) study was used. Cognition was measured at baseline and 4 years later using the Mini-Mental Cabán (MMC), with scoring 1.5 SD below the MMC score adjusted for age, education, gender, and reading ability comprising cognitive impairment. Complexity scores were derived from the 1970 U.S. Census, 1977 and 2000 Dictionary of Occupational Titles, and 2001 O*Net. Results Controlling for baseline age, gender, childhood economic hardship, adult money problems, depressive symptoms, and self-reported health, greater scores for most work complexity measures were associated with significantly lower risk of cognitive impairment (ps < .05), with significant odds ratios ranging between 0.74, reflecting 26% reduction in risk for every extra standard deviation of complexity, and 0.81. Controlling for education reduced these effects slightly but also reduced most associations to nonsignificant. The Results were stronger for those with less childhood economic hardship or education (ps < .05). Discussion Complexity of work may reduce risk of cognitive impairment in Puerto Rican older adults, especially when combined with favorable childhood economic conditions and higher educational attainment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross Andel & Ana Luisa Dávila-Roman & Catherine Grotz & Brent J Small & Kyriakos S Markides & Michael Crowe, 2019. "Complexity of Work and Incident Cognitive Impairment in Puerto Rican Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(5), pages 785-795.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:5:p:785-795.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx127
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:5:p:785-795.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.