IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i2p329-338..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

For Better or Worse? Couples’ Time Together in Encore Adulthood

Author

Listed:
  • Katie R Genadek
  • Sarah M Flood
  • Phyllis Moen

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study examined the amount of time married couples share together in a new “encore adult†life course stage around the 50s, 60s, and 70s. Also investigated was the relationship between shared time and experienced well-being for this age group. Method Time diary and survey data were used from nationally representative 2003–2014 American Time Use Survey (ATUS) data for 26,303 adults aged 50–79 years. Analyses examined amount of total and exclusive shared couple time and experiences of happiness and stress when together using multivariate models. Results Shared time was positively associated with couples living on their own, conjoint employment/nonemployment, and age. Encore women and men reported feeling happier and less stressed when with their spouses. Men seemed to find time with spouses more enjoyable if both partners or just their wives were working. Discussion Encore adults are living longer as couples; results suggest couple relationships may occupy most of their days, with potentially positive implications for emotional well-being. Men and women are happier during time with a spouse when the woman works, with men reporting even higher levels of happiness than women. This is important as contemporary couples navigate increasingly complex work/retirement transitions in gendered ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie R Genadek & Sarah M Flood & Phyllis Moen, 2019. "For Better or Worse? Couples’ Time Together in Encore Adulthood," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(2), pages 329-338.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:329-338.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx129
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:329-338.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.