IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i2p298-308..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A National Dyadic Study of Oral Sex, Relationship Quality, and Well-Being among Older Couples

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Liu
  • Shannon Shen
  • Ning Hsieh

Abstract

Objectives We examine how giving versus receiving oral sex, 2 processes that are linked to relationship quality, are associated with older men’s and women’s well-being. Method We analyzed 884 heterosexual couples from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (2010–2011). We estimate Actor–Partner Interdependence Models using the SEM approach to assess three well-being outcomes: general happiness, psychological distress, and self-reported mental health. Results Older adults with better relationship quality gave oral sex to their partner more often than those with worse relationship quality; this association was stronger for men than for women. While receiving oral sex was positively related to both men’s, and women’s perceptions of relationship quality, women’s relationship quality was more strongly linked to their partners’ well-being than men’s. Correspondingly, men’s giving of oral sex (and thus their female partner’s receiving of oral sex) was positively related to their own well-being through increasing their female partner’s perceived relationship quality. Discussion Given the high prevalence of sexual dysfunctions among older adults, oral sex may play an important but overlooked role in maintaining an active sexual life, a high-quality relationship, and psychological vibrancy in late life.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Liu & Shannon Shen & Ning Hsieh, 2019. "A National Dyadic Study of Oral Sex, Relationship Quality, and Well-Being among Older Couples," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(2), pages 298-308.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:298-308.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby089
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colm O’Muircheartaigh & Ned English & Steven Pedlow & Peter K. Kwok, 2014. "Sample Design, Sample Augmentation, and Estimation for Wave 2 of the NSHAP," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(Suppl_2), pages 15-26.
    2. Linda Waite & Aniruddha Das, 2010. "Families, social life, and well-being at older ages," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(1), pages 87-109, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jo Mhairi Hale, 2017. "Cognitive Disparities: The Impact of the Great Depression and Cumulative Inequality on Later-Life Cognitive Function," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(6), pages 2125-2158, December.
    2. Das, Aniruddha, 2021. "The relational genomics of cognitive function: A longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Joo, Won-tak, 2023. "Educational gradient in social network changes at disease diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    4. Aniruddha Das & Deborah Carr, 2021. "Transpersonal Genetic Effects Among Older U.S. Couples: A Longitudinal Study [Convoys of social relations: Past, present, and future]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(1), pages 184-194.
    5. Das, Aniruddha, 2019. "Genes, depressive symptoms, and chronic stressors: A nationally representative longitudinal study in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    6. Hawkley, Louise C. & Steptoe, Andrew & Schumm, L. Philip & Wroblewski, Kristen, 2020. "Comparing loneliness in England and the United States, 2014–2016: Differential item functioning and risk factor prevalence and impact," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Zhe Ji & Elsie Yan, 2022. "Psycho-Social Factors Associated with Intimacy Needs in Divorced and Widowed Older Chinese Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Das, Aniruddha, 2022. "Religious attendance and global cognitive function: A fixed-effects cross-lagged panel modeling study of older U.S. adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    9. Das, Aniruddha, 2016. "Psychosocial distress and inflammation: Which way does causality flow?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-8.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:298-308.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.