IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i3p388-399..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associations Among Individuals’ Perceptions of Future Time, Individual Resources, and Subjective Well-Being in Old Age

Author

Listed:
  • Christiane A. Hoppmann
  • Frank J. Infurna
  • Nilam Ram
  • Denis Gerstorf

Abstract

Objectives:Perceptions of future time are of key interest to aging research because of their implications for subjective well-being. Interestingly, perceptions about future time are only moderately associated with age when looking at the second half of life, pointing to a vast heterogeneity in future time perceptions among older adults. We examine associations between future time perceptions, age, and subjective well-being across two studies, including moderations by individual resources.Method:Using data from the Berlin Aging Study (N = 516; Mage = 85 years), we link one operationalization (subjective nearness to death) and age to subjective well-being. Using Health and Retirement Study data (N = 2,596; Mage = 77 years), we examine associations of another future time perception indicator (subjective future life expectancy) and age with subjective well-being.Results:Consistent across studies, perceptions of limited time left were associated with poorer subjective well-being (lower life satisfaction and positive affect; more negative affect and depressive symptoms). Importantly, individual resources moderated future time perception—subjective well-being associations with those of better health exhibiting reduced future time perception—subjective well-being associations.Discussion:We discuss our findings in the context of the Model of Strength and Vulnerability Integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Christiane A. Hoppmann & Frank J. Infurna & Nilam Ram & Denis Gerstorf, 2017. "Associations Among Individuals’ Perceptions of Future Time, Individual Resources, and Subjective Well-Being in Old Age," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 388-399.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:3:p:388-399.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbv063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindsay M. Pitzer & C. S. Bergeman, 2014. "Synchrony in Affect Among Stressed Adults: The Notre Dame Widowhood Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(1), pages 29-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne J. Dutt & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2019. "Future time perspective and general self-efficacy mediate the association between awareness of age-related losses and depressive symptoms," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 227-236, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:3:p:388-399.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.