IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v69y2014i4p590-602..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in Functional Health: Latent Curve Analysis Assessing Differential Exposure

Author

Listed:
  • Leah S. Rohlfsen
  • Jennie Jacobs Kronenfeld

Abstract

Objectives. To examine gender difference in trajectories of functional limitations among middle-aged and older adults using a comprehensive set of predictors and method not previously used to examine this topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Leah S. Rohlfsen & Jennie Jacobs Kronenfeld, 2014. "Gender Differences in Functional Health: Latent Curve Analysis Assessing Differential Exposure," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(4), pages 590-602.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:69:y:2014:i:4:p:590-602.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbu021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milla Saajanaho & Anne Viljanen & Sanna Read & Johanna Eronen & Jaakko Kaprio & Marja Jylhä & Taina Rantanen, 2016. "Mobility Limitation and Changes in Personal Goals Among Older Women," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(1), pages 1-10.
    2. Pruchno, Rachel & Wilson-Genderson, Maureen & Heid, Allison R. & Cartwright, Francine P., 2021. "Effects of peri-traumatic stress experienced during Hurricane Sandy on functional limitation trajectories for older men and women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    3. Nieboer, Anna P. & Cramm, Jane M., 2018. "How do older people achieve well-being? Validation of the Social Production Function Instrument for the level of well-being–short (SPF-ILs)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 304-313.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:69:y:2014:i:4:p:590-602.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.