IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v66by2011i3p321-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laypeople's Conceptions of Wisdom and Its Development: Cognitive and Integrative Views

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Glück
  • Susan Bluck

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Glück & Susan Bluck, 2011. "Laypeople's Conceptions of Wisdom and Its Development: Cognitive and Integrative Views," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(3), pages 321-324.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:66b:y:2011:i:3:p:321-324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbr011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasilios Gialamas & Sofia Iliadou Tachou & Alexia Orfanou, 2016. "Negotiating Boundaries Between Gender and Social Identities in the Principality of Samos: The Case of Divorces (1902-1911)," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, September.
    2. Ajit Nayak, 2016. "Wisdom and the Tragic Question: Moral Learning and Emotional Perception in Leadership and Organisations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Chao S Hu & Michel Ferrari & Ru-De Liu & Qin Gao & Ethan Weare, 2018. "Mainland Chinese Implicit Theory of Wisdom: Generational and Cultural Differences," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(8), pages 1416-1424.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:66b:y:2011:i:3:p:321-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.