IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v6y1979i3p319-336..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical programming models as tools for centralized planning in decentralized decision situations:A critical examination of the reliability of agricultural sector models as a basis for policy decisions

Author

Listed:
  • GERHARD SCHIEFER

Abstract

Summary We consider the solution of decision problems of political agencies that are interested in the agricultural production activity, its spatial or temporal distribution etc. on a regional, national or international level. These agencies are faced with decision problems concerning the realization of economic activities that are basically determined by the decisions of individual farms that are free to make their own decisions within the limits of economic and technological constraints. This raises the question of to what extent an agency's computations of possible future economic activities will conform to reality if its information about the farms' future decision situation is not complete. Examples show that the computed results might be so unreliable that their relevance for the solution of an agency's decision problem might be very limited. In an economy of a non-command decision structure this applies to the use of ‘positive’ and ‘normative’ models. The paper discusses the relevance of reliability examinations for the evaluation of computed agricultural production activity. Furthermore, approaches for the identification and improvement of the reliability of computed results are discussed. Although the article concentrates on the use of programming models for the simulation of possible activities of the farms, it refers also to other types of models that might be used for this purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerhard Schiefer, 1979. "Mathematical programming models as tools for centralized planning in decentralized decision situations:A critical examination of the reliability of agricultural sector models as a basis for policy dec," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 6(3), pages 319-336.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:6:y:1979:i:3:p:319-336.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/6.3.319
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:6:y:1979:i:3:p:319-336.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.