IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v52y2025i4p848-911..html

Organic cultivation and farmland prices: Does certification matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Seifert
  • Silke Hüttel
  • Axel Werwatz

Abstract

Organic cultivation offers environmental benefits such as improved soil functioning; however, whether an organic cultivation history capitalizes in farmland values remains unclear. We analyse price differentials between organic and conventional arable land in Brandenburg, Germany, using detailed land transaction data and longitudinal land-use data. Based on a doubly robust approach combining matching and regression, we find on average no price differential between organic and conventional farmland at the time of sale. Investigating effect heterogeneity over time, in space, and by post-sale use indicates that this null effect comprises markups and markdowns for organic farmland.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Seifert & Silke Hüttel & Axel Werwatz, 2025. "Organic cultivation and farmland prices: Does certification matter?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 52(4), pages 848-911.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:848-911.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbaf026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:848-911.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.