IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v52y2025i4p778-817..html

A comprehensive analysis of urban–rural differences: The case of food consumption in China

Author

Listed:
  • Vardges Hovhannisyan
  • Armen Khachatryan
  • Serhat Asci

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and rural-to-urban migration in China have led to significant dietary changes and greater reliance on Western foods. Previous studies have recognized the importance of urbanization but have overlooked key aspects. They neglect the mechanisms behind these shifts, assume uniform consumer responses, and underestimate the impact of food precommitments and demand for food quality. We analyze the impact of urbanization on food consumption using a Generalized Exact Affine Stone Index model, building on advancements in consumer theory. Our study highlights how urbanization offers dietary flexibility, while rural consumers tend to have precommitments. Despite data limitations, we assess food accessibility, availability, and consumer lifestyles as factors contributing to urban–rural dietary disparities. As rural incomes increase, consumers become more conscious of food quality, while urban residents consider further quality improvements less significant. Greater food accessibility and shifts in lifestyle affect dietary variations observed between urban and rural areas, where widening lifestyle gaps reduce quantity disparities while increasing quality gaps. Grasping these dynamics is essential for tackling food security, sustainability, and public health, as urbanization aims to reduce poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Vardges Hovhannisyan & Armen Khachatryan & Serhat Asci, 2025. "A comprehensive analysis of urban–rural differences: The case of food consumption in China," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 52(4), pages 778-817.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:778-817.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbaf023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:778-817.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.