IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v48y2021i4p785-804..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental mindset for environmental challenges: the puzzling case of public good contributions
[Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments]

Author

Listed:
  • Jason F Shogren
  • Jacob Hochard
  • Katherine D Lee
  • Leticia Varelas Henderson

Abstract

The experimental mindset strips down and mimics social constructs in a setting we can use to understand how institutions create or destroy economic value. We explore how to use the mindset to consider climate change mitigation, in which more investment in climate mitigation by the collective, the less costly for each party. Using the lab to capture Conference of the Parties declining-cost environment with a jigsaw puzzle to mimic real-time costs, we find decreasing ‘cost’ of commitment increases contribution but not reaching the public good threshold. Highlighting the economies of scale might be an effective way to elicit greater commitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason F Shogren & Jacob Hochard & Katherine D Lee & Leticia Varelas Henderson, 2021. "Experimental mindset for environmental challenges: the puzzling case of public good contributions [Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(4), pages 785-804.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:785-804.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbab033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:785-804.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.