IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v47y2020i1p226-246..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost of wild boar to farmers in Sweden
[Tobit models: a survey]

Author

Listed:
  • I -M Gren
  • H Andersson
  • J Mensah
  • T Pettersson

Abstract

Wild boar are widespread mammals in the world that can cause serious economic damage to farmers. Using data from a survey of farmers in Sweden, this study provides estimates of the cost of wild boar (crop loss, machinery damage, protection) to farmers in Sweden. The results indicate that 39 per cent of respondents had experienced at least one of the three types of costs and that they report a wide range of damage values. Regression results from an instrumental variable Tobit model showed that costs are significantly increasing in wild boar abundance and landscape diversity, and decreasing in the share of grain production.

Suggested Citation

  • I -M Gren & H Andersson & J Mensah & T Pettersson, 2020. "Cost of wild boar to farmers in Sweden [Tobit models: a survey]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(1), pages 226-246.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:47:y:2020:i:1:p:226-246.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbz016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julian E. Lozano & Katarina Elofsson & Yves Surry & George Marbuah, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Game Harvests in Sweden," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(2), pages 385-408, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:47:y:2020:i:1:p:226-246.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.