IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v47y2020i1p178-199..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex
[A rational expectations model of time varying risk premia in commodities futures markets: theory and evidence]

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Huang
  • Teresa Serra
  • Philip Garcia

Abstract

Using quantile regression, we evaluate the forecasting performance of futures prices in the soybean complex. The procedure provides a more complete picture of the distribution of forecasts than mainstream methods that only focus on central tendency measures. Forecast performance differs by location in the futures price distribution. Futures forecast perform well in the centre of the distribution. However, futures prices tend to over-forecast when futures prices are high and under-forecast when futures prices are low, suggesting that futures prices tend to under-estimate price reversion towards the centre of the distribution. Forecast errors are larger when futures prices are high. The findings are related to theories in the literature used to explain pricing bias, and their implications for market participants are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Huang & Teresa Serra & Philip Garcia, 2020. "Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex [A rational expectations model of time varying risk premia in commodities futures markets: theory ," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(1), pages 178-199.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:47:y:2020:i:1:p:178-199.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbz009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:47:y:2020:i:1:p:178-199.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.