IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v3y1976i2-3p431-444..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Summary and conclusions

Author

Listed:
  • GLENN L. JOHNSON
  • MICHEL PETIT

Abstract

The processes of agrarian change and the problems created by such change result in growth, decline, or stagnation as the net balance over time between investment and disinvestment There are institutional, technical, and human aspects of agrarian change. Recursive programming models, general system-science simulations, and information control theory have been examined in order to determine their potential contributions to a study of the processes of change particularly when they are viewed as adaptive processes. There is a close relationship between these three approaches, especially when explicit attention is given to the informal ‘components’ associated with their problem-solving use. This relationship involves interactions between (1) investigation, decision-making, and responsibility bearing or, alternatively, between investigators, decision-makers, and those affected; (2) the feedback loops important in theories of adaptive behavior, control theory, and cybernetics; and (3) the iterative modelling and computing characteristics of the general, system-science simulation approach when carried out in close interaction with decision-makers. Our examination of the problems of real world decision-makers (as contrasted to those persons making decisions about disciplinary matters in academia) indicates that, typically, many disciplines are involved in solving a particular practical problem. A great variation in the required mix of disciplines occurs as different practical problems are studied. Since the problems of agrarian change often originate in and are solved by institutional, technical, and human change, problem-solving research often deals with understanding and adjusting the processes of change. The need to deal with the subject matter of many disciplines typically exceeds the capacity of one individual. Thus, problem-solving teams are ordinarily required. However, the need for contributions from many disciplines does not justify the neglect of any discipline. Further, disciplinary excellence is important in solving any particular problem. The main purpose of this set of articles has been to suggest a number of ideas which cast some light on the major obstacles faced by those studying the processes of agricultural change. Approaches are suggested for dealing with issues which face individual agents or society at large as a consequence of the changes taking place in agriculture. It is now time to assess what has been achieved and to point out the main limitations of our current knowledge. Then we can propose orientations and projects designed to overcome the difficulties encountered.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn L. Johnson & Michel Petit, 1976. "Summary and conclusions," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 3(2-3), pages 431-444.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:3:y:1976:i:2-3:p:431-444.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/3.2-3.431
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:3:y:1976:i:2-3:p:431-444.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.