IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v1y1973i4p367-389..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systems models to simulate structural change in agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • HARTWIG DE HAEN

Abstract

The article discusses the contribution of systems analysis and simulation to the analysis and projection of structural change in agriculture. It starts out with a discussion of general problems of agricultural change and emphasizes the need for appropriate models to control this process by means of policy instruments. Consequently the main part deals with some basic concepts of systems theory and simulation which appear to be useful in this context. Simulation is defined as a numerical method to describe the behaviour of a system under a finite number of randomly or independently selected environmental conditions. Compared to analytical tools it provides a greater flexibility with respect to model structure and component link. The specific concepts discussed in more detail refer to topics of considerable relevance in the process of agricultural change. These concepts are Stochastic simulation; explicit incorporation of delay functions; feedback and control mechanism for economic policy. Three aspects of ‘experimental design’ for projections under varying factor configurations are discussed: Policy projections to analyze factor response relationships (response surfaces); determination of optimal levels of policy instruments or control strategies for given goal structures; construction of social preference orderings for policy makers by means of experiments. Finally three empirical approaches to the simulation of structural change in agriculture with comprehensive systems models are discussed with respect to model structure and economic content.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartwig De Haen, 1973. "Systems models to simulate structural change in agriculture," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 1(4), pages 367-389.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:1:y:1973:i:4:p:367-389.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/1.4.367
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:1:y:1973:i:4:p:367-389.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.