IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/envlaw/v36y2024i1p23-42..html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

The European Climate Law: Strengthening EU Procedural Climate Governance?

Author

Listed:
  • Kati Kulovesi
  • Sebastian Oberthür
  • Harro van Asselt
  • Annalisa Savaresi

Abstract

In 2021, the European Union (EU) adopted the so-called European Climate Law (ECL), enshrining in law the 2050 climate-neutrality objective and upgraded 2030 emission reduction target. The ECL bears the hallmarks of what we term ‘procedural climate governance’, which comprises the regulatory frameworks, instruments, institutions and processes that shape substantive climate policies and their implementation. This article identifies seven key functions of procedural climate governance—target-setting; planning; monitoring and evaluation; climate policy integration; scientific expert advice; access to justice; and public participation—and uses these for critically assessing the ECL. We argue that while the ECL has significantly strengthened important aspects of EU procedural climate governance, further reforms are needed for the EU to develop and implement the substantive policies towards a climate-neutral and climate-resilient economy and society and to bolster public support and ownership of the transition. The upcoming reviews of the ECL and the Governance Regulation provide a critical opportunity for strengthening procedural climate governance in the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Kati Kulovesi & Sebastian Oberthür & Harro van Asselt & Annalisa Savaresi, 2024. "The European Climate Law: Strengthening EU Procedural Climate Governance?," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 23-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:23-42.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqad034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:23-42.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.