IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecinqu/v40y2002i4p704-710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Analysis of A Hybrid Liability Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Harold Winter

Abstract

This article considers a legal setting with a tort liability rule that includes both a care-based component (such as negligence) and a non--care-based component (such as no liability). Children trespassers are sometimes protected by a doctrine known as attractive nuisance. Attractive nuisance acts as a hybrid liability rule in its application--it applies the negligence rule to accidents involving some types of children, and the no-liability rule to accidents involving other types of children. A standard economic model of torts is applied to a trespass setting, and the potential efficiency of a hybrid liability rule is examined. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Harold Winter, 2002. "An Economic Analysis of A Hybrid Liability Rule," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(4), pages 704-710, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:40:y:2002:i:4:p:704-710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. González, Patrick, 2003. "Optimal Assignment of Liabilities," Cahiers de recherche 0305, Université Laval - Département d'économique.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:40:y:2002:i:4:p:704-710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.