IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v15y2022i3p597-614..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The future of the corporate office? Emerging trends in the post-Covid city
[Planners as market actors: rethinking state-market relations in land and property]

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Fiorentino
  • Nicola Livingstone
  • Pat McAllister
  • Howard Cooke

Abstract

Part of an ongoing longitudinal study, this article provides evidence on the emerging impacts of Covid-19 on the demand for, configuration and role of offices in cities, drawing on primary data from semi-structured interviews with UK-based corporate real estate managers. The research is grounded on a ‘theory of change’ framework combining real estate, institutional economics and economic geography literature. Our findings confirm an acceleration towards hybrid working patterns. While some changes in the current use of offices may be temporary or more dynamic, other adjustments may be permanent (for example working from home, portfolio rationalisations) and trigger structural changes across cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Fiorentino & Nicola Livingstone & Pat McAllister & Howard Cooke, 2022. "The future of the corporate office? Emerging trends in the post-Covid city [Planners as market actors: rethinking state-market relations in land and property]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(3), pages 597-614.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:597-614.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsac027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:597-614.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.