IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v44y2020i4p749-779..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Macroeconomic policies in Brazil before and after the 2008 global financial crisis: Brazilian policy-makers still trapped in the New Macroeconomic Consensus guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • André Nassif
  • Carmem Feijó
  • Eliane Araújo

Abstract

Even though the New Macroeconomic Consensus (NMC) guidelines have been under review by mainstream economists from developed countries since the 2008 global financial crisis, Brazilian policy-makers are still following these old recommendations. The NMC was adapted in Brazil in 1999 as a policy arrangement known as the macroeconomic tripod: a combination of inflation targeting, floating exchange rates and targets for the primary fiscal surplus. The theoretical basis of this policy arrangement is thus closely aligned to that of the NMC: a reduced (if any) role for fiscal policy and an exclusive focus on price stability for monetary policy. Particularly with respect to the experience of inflation targeting in Brazil, by implementing a vector autoregression model for the period 2000–17, we show that (i) inflation dynamics are mostly cost-push rather than demand-pull; (ii) inflation rates show low sensitivity to changes in interest rates; and (iii) the main variables negatively affected by an increase in the Brazilian policy rate are the nominal exchange rate (i.e. the Brazilian real tends to appreciate) and output growth. It follows that the macroeconomic tripod is unsuitable to the Brazilian economy, especially considering that, as it is also shown in this article, such arrangement has contributed to perpetuating trends of high real interest rates, domestic currency overvaluation and low economic growth in Brazil in the last two decades. The article ends calling for a new macroeconomic arrangement to reverse these adverse long-term trends.

Suggested Citation

  • André Nassif & Carmem Feijó & Eliane Araújo, 2020. "Macroeconomic policies in Brazil before and after the 2008 global financial crisis: Brazilian policy-makers still trapped in the New Macroeconomic Consensus guidelines," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 44(4), pages 749-779.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:44:y:2020:i:4:p:749-779.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaa014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduardo Mantoan & Vinícius Centeno & Carmem Feijo, 2021. "Why has the Brazilian economy stagnated in the 2010s? A Minskyan analysis of the behavior of non-financial companies in a financialized economy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 529-550, December.
    2. Carmem Feijo & Marcos Tostes Lamonica & Sergiany da Silva Lima, 2022. "Growth and stagnation in a dual economy: The case of Brazil," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(301), pages 119-138.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:44:y:2020:i:4:p:749-779.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.