IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v40y2016i3p727-753..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Companies and markets: economic theories of the firm and a concept of companies as bargaining agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Spread

Abstract

The depiction of the firm in neoclassical theory in terms of a production function is widely recognised as unsatisfactory. Economists have sought to provide more realistic theories of the firm through attributing to them functions of minimisation of transaction costs, accommodation of bounded rationality, assembly of information, etc. These functions are seen as supplementary to their role as participants in a broadly neoclassical market framework. This paper suggests that the theories do nothing to increase the understanding of the firm; rather, they deepen the misconceptions that arise from the neoclassical model. The paper proposes a theory of companies as bargaining agencies meeting a viability condition in the context of situation-related consumer demand. The proposed concept integrates the important phenomena of technological innovation and distance fully into the concept of company operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Spread, 2016. "Companies and markets: economic theories of the firm and a concept of companies as bargaining agencies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(3), pages 727-753.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:40:y:2016:i:3:p:727-753.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bev029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jo, Tae-Hee, 2016. "A Heterodox Theory of the Business Enterprise," MPRA Paper 72426, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:40:y:2016:i:3:p:727-753.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.