IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v36y2012i6p1479-1496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An 'unproductive labour' view of finance

Author

Listed:
  • Aldo Barba
  • Giancarlo de Vivo

Abstract

The present paper discusses the role of the financial sector in a capitalist economy, arguing that the huge increase in its weight (economic and otherwise) in the last decades is not justified by the importance of its contribution to economic growth. The point is developed going back to the classical concepts of productive and unproductive labour. There are two dimensions of these concepts that we discuss. The first links the social efficiency of the financial sector to its role in the reproduction process, crucially distinguishing basic from non-basic uses. We argue that many financial services usually seen as services to production really consist of the provision of gambling facilities, and thereby have to be considered at best as luxury goods. When evaluated according to its reproductive capability, the service of arranging a gambling house cannot be seen as producing social value. A second sense in which the discussion of productive and unproductive labour casts light on the nature of some financial services is that connected to the conception of pure circulation costs, as different from costs of production proper. The amount of circulation costs varies with the varying intensity of the realisation problem. They are not defined by the production technique and are, in this sense, arbitrary. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Aldo Barba & Giancarlo de Vivo, 2012. "An 'unproductive labour' view of finance," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(6), pages 1479-1496.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:6:p:1479-1496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Ramirez, 2015. "Credit, Indebtedness, and Speculation in the Marxian Paradigm: A Critical Analysis," Working Papers 1507, Trinity College, Department of Economics.
    2. Miguel D. Ramirez, 2020. "Capital as a social process: A Marxian perspective," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 9(1), pages 41-71.
    3. Miguel D. Ramirez, 2019. "Credit, Indebtedness and Speculation in Marx's Political Economy," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 8, pages 46-62, December.
    4. Di Bucchianico, Stefano, 2019. "The Impact of Financialization on the Rate of Profit: A Discussion," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP36, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:6:p:1479-1496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.