IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v36y2012i6p1417-1432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the present state of the capital controversy

Author

Listed:
  • Pierangelo Garegnani

Abstract

The post-war capital controversy seems to have had two distinguishable stages. Thanks to the unambiguous phenomena of reswitching and reverse capital deepening, the first stage was conclusive in discarding from pure theory the traditional versions of neoclassical theory that relied on the notion of capital as a single quantity. Subsequently, however, when the implications of those phenomena took centre stage in the controversy, together with the reformulations of the theory which intended to do away with the ‘quantity of capital’, several misunderstandings prevented, I shall contend, decisive progress in the analysis and we entered an inconclusive phase of the discussion.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Pierangelo Garegnani, 2012. "On the present state of the capital controversy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(6), pages 1417-1432.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:6:p:1417-1432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martins, Nuno Ornelas, 2021. "The economics of biodiversity: Accounting for human impact in the biosphere," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Xiaofeng Liu, 2019. "A Contribution to Theory of Factor Income Distribution, Cambridge Capital Controversy and Equity Premium Puzzle," Papers 1911.12490, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    3. G. C. Harcourt, 2015. "On the Cambridge, England, Critique of the Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 243-255, June.
    4. Ajit Sinha, 2015. "A Reflection on the Samuelson-Garegnani Debate," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-48, September.
    5. Stefano Di Bucchianico & Riccardo Pariboni, 2022. "Garegnani, dieci anni dopo: introduzione al numero speciale (Garegnani, ten years after: introduction to the special issue)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 75(299), pages 227-231.
    6. Antonella Stirati, 2016. "Real wages in the business cycle and the theory of income distribution: an unresolved conflict between theory and facts in mainstream macroeconomics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 639-661.
    7. Fabio Petri, 2017. "The Passage of Time, Capital, and Investment in Traditional and in Recent Neoclassical Value Theory," Department of Economics University of Siena 750, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    8. Saverio M. Fratini, 2019. "On The Second Stage Of The Cambridge Capital Controversy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1073-1093, September.
    9. Fabio Petri, 2022. "General equilibrium and the neo‐Ricardian critique: On Bloise and Reichlin," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(4), pages 1021-1047, November.
    10. Matteo Deleidi & Walter Paternesi Meloni & Antonella Stirati, 2018. "Structural change, labour productivity and the Kaldor-Verdoorn law: evidence from European countries," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0239, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    11. Fabio Petri, 2021. "None so deaf as those that will not hear: on Garegnani’s contributions to the capital-theoretic critique and the resistances to accepting them," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 15(2), pages 187-207, December.
    12. Stirati, Antonella, 2014. "Real wages in the business cycle: an unresolved conflict between theory and facts in mainstream macroeconomics," MPRA Paper 53743, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Carlo Milana, 2019. "Solving the Reswitching Paradox in the Sraffian Theory of Capital," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 97-125, November.
    14. Enrico Sergio Levrero, 2021. "Garegnani’s work and the prospects of the surplus approach: an introduction," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 15(2), pages 115-121, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:6:p:1417-1432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.