IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v33y2009i1p51-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(How) do flexible labour markets really work? The role of profitability in influencing unemployment

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Lewis

Abstract

This paper assesses the theoretical justifications available for policies of flexible labour markets (FLMs) in reducing the level of unemployment in developed economies. It empirically assesses the OECD's rationalisation of policy linking profitability to investment and job creation in four country cases. New capital investment is found to be significant for unemployment in all cases but it is not found to be a consequence of the mechanistic achievement of 'normal' profits. Without an empirically supported mechanism for how FLMs reduce unemployment, the policy is open to the accusation of being no more than a political tool for altering distribution, without concern for the wider socio-economic consequences. Copyright The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Lewis, 2009. "(How) do flexible labour markets really work? The role of profitability in influencing unemployment," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(1), pages 51-77, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:33:y:2009:i:1:p:51-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/ben029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:33:y:2009:i:1:p:51-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.