IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v25y2001i5p685-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hollander, de Vivo and the 'Further Evidence' for the Corn Model Interpretation of Ricardo: A Conspiracy of Silence?

Author

Listed:
  • Peach, Terry

Abstract

This paper reconsiders the debate between de Vivo and Hollander over the "further evidence" in favour of Sraffa's "corn model" interpretation of Ricardo in the light of Torrens's Letter to Lord Liverpool (1816). It is argued that the Letter provides unique evidence of the influence on Torrens of Ricardo's Essay on Profits (1815); and that, contrary to de Vivo, the evidence is not that of a "corn model" influence. It is further argued that the manner in which the Letter has been dealt with is unsatisfactory. The shortcomings in Hollander's position are traced to peculiarities in his long-standing interpretation of the early Ricardo. Copyright 2001 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Peach, Terry, 2001. "Hollander, de Vivo and the 'Further Evidence' for the Corn Model Interpretation of Ricardo: A Conspiracy of Silence?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 25(5), pages 685-692, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:25:y:2001:i:5:p:685-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duccio Cavalieri, 2009. "Sull'inseparabilit? delle strutture sintattiche nell'analisi classica del valore e della distribuzione," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(97), pages 5-46.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:25:y:2001:i:5:p:685-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.