Harrod's Dynamics and the Theory of Growth: The Story of a Mistaken Attribution
Post-Keynesian growth theory is normally seen as originating from Harrod's 1939 "Essay in Dynamic Theory". Harrod, however, was trying to lay the foundations of a new approach to economic dynamics, and often complained of misinterpretation. In this paper, the grounds of Harrod's argument are examined and compared with the "textbook" interpretation. The latter is shown to be extremely reductive, as it ignores both Harrod's interest in the trade cycle and his methodological criticism of the "time-lag theories of the cycle", and it also underrates the interesting implications of his non-linear approach and the epistemic implications of the instability principle. Copyright 2001 by Oxford University Press.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 25 (2001)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://www.cje.oupjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:25:y:2001:i:1:p:79-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.