Nonparametric tests for and against likelihood ratio ordering in the two-sample problem
We derive nonparametric procedures for testing for and against likelihood ratio ordering in the two-population setting with continuous distributions. We account for this ordering by examining the least concave majorant of the ordinal dominance curve formed from the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimators of the continuous distribution functions F and G. In particular, we focus on testing equality of F and G versus likelihood ratio ordering and testing for a violation of likelihood ratio ordering. For both testing problems, we propose area-based and sup-norm-based test statistics, derive appropriate limiting distributions, and provide simulation results that characterise the performance of our procedures. We illustrate our methods using data from a controlled experiment involving the effects of radiation on mice. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 92 (2005)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:92:y:2005:i:1:p:159-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.