IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v110y2023i2p449-465..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating causes of effects by posterior effects of causes

Author

Listed:
  • Zitong Lu
  • Zhi Geng
  • Wei Li
  • Shengyu Zhu
  • Jinzhu Jia

Abstract

SummaryFor the case with a single causal variable, Dawid et al. (2014) defined the probability of causation, and Pearl (2000) defined the probability of necessity to assess the causes of effects. For a case with multiple causes that could affect each other, this paper defines the posterior total and direct causal effects based on the evidence observed for post-treatment variables, which could be viewed as measurements of causes of effects. Posterior causal effects involve the probabilities of counterfactual variables. Thus, as with the probability of causation, the probability of necessity and direct causal effects, the identifiability of posterior total and direct causal effects requires more assumptions than the identifiability of traditional causal effects conditional on pre-treatment variables. We present assumptions required for the identifiability of posterior causal effects and provide identification equations. Further, when the causal relationships between multiple causes and an endpoint can be depicted by causal networks, we can simplify both the required assumptions and the identification equations of the posterior total and direct causal effects. Finally, using numerical examples, we compare the posterior total and direct causal effects with other measures for evaluating the causes of effects and the population attributable risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Zitong Lu & Zhi Geng & Wei Li & Shengyu Zhu & Jinzhu Jia, 2023. "Evaluating causes of effects by posterior effects of causes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(2), pages 449-465.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:2:p:449-465.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asac038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:2:p:449-465.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.