IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v34y2023i2p189-196..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eyes on the future: buffering increased costs of incubation by abandoning offspring

Author

Listed:
  • Sveinn Are Hanssen
  • Kjell Einar Erikstad
  • Hanno Sandvik
  • Torkild Tveraa
  • Jan Ove Bustnes

Abstract

Life history theory states that the resources invested in current reproduction must be traded off against resources needed for survival and future reproduction. Long-lived organisms have a higher residual reproductive value and are therefore expected to be sensitive to reproductive investments that may reduce survival and future reproduction. Individuals within a population may vary in phenotypic quality, experience, access to resources etc. This may affect their optimal reproductive investment level. In this study we manipulated reproductive costs by shortening and extending the incubation period in common eiders Somateria mollissima without altering clutch size. Females whose incubation time was prolonged experimentally, suffered higher mass loss and increased clutch loss/nest desertion. These females were also more prone to abandon their brood after hatching. Both clutch loss and brood abandonment decreased with clutch size in all treatment categories, indicating higher phenotypic quality and/or better access to resources for females producing more eggs. However, although females with prolonged incubation were lighter at hatching, their return rate and breeding performance in the following year were unaffected. These results show that individual quality as expressed through clutch size and body mass is affecting current reproductive investment level as well as future survival and breeding performance. The results also show that individual birds are sensitive to changes in their own condition, and when reproductive effort is approaching a level where survival or future survival may be compromised, they respond by terminating their current reproductive attempt.

Suggested Citation

  • Sveinn Are Hanssen & Kjell Einar Erikstad & Hanno Sandvik & Torkild Tveraa & Jan Ove Bustnes, 2023. "Eyes on the future: buffering increased costs of incubation by abandoning offspring," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 189-196.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:189-196.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac116
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shana M. Caro & Ashleigh S. Griffin & Camilla A. Hinde & Stuart A. West, 2016. "Unpredictable environments lead to the evolution of parental neglect in birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. József Garay & Villő Csiszár & Tamás F Móri & András Szilágyi & Zoltán Varga & Szabolcs Számadó, 2018. "Juvenile honest food solicitation and parental investment as a life history strategy: A kin demographic selection model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Ariane Mutzel & Anne-Lise Olsen & Kimberley J Mathot & Yimen G Araya-Ajoy & Marion Nicolaus & Jan J Wijmenga & Jonathan Wright & Bart Kempenaers & Niels J Dingemanse, 2019. "Effects of manipulated levels of predation threat on parental provisioning and nestling begging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1123-1135.
    3. Szabolcs Számadó & Dániel Czégel & István Zachar, 2019. "One problem, too many solutions: How costly is honest signalling of need?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:189-196.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.