IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v28y2017i5p1376-1383..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prior information and social experience influence male reproductive decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse Balaban-Feld
  • Thomas J Valone

Abstract

Lay SummaryMate preferences vary among individuals. We show that male fruit fly courtship preferences are influenced by their previous experiences. Males that previously experienced a population of mostly large, high-quality females biased their subsequent courtship behavior toward large females more than males that had previously experienced mostly small females. Males that had experienced mostly small, low-quality females, and who had mated with a small female, tended to bias their subsequent courtship toward such low-quality females.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse Balaban-Feld & Thomas J Valone, 2017. "Prior information and social experience influence male reproductive decisions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1376-1383.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:5:p:1376-1383.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arx105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reuven Dukas, 2004. "Male fruit flies learn to avoid interspecific courtship," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(4), pages 695-698, July.
    2. Tim W. Fawcett & Colin Bleay, 2009. "Previous experiences shape adaptive mate preferences," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(1), pages 68-78.
    3. Seth W. Coleman & Gail L. Patricelli & Gerald Borgia, 2004. "Variable female preferences drive complex male displays," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6984), pages 742-745, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurelie Seguin & Wolfgang Forstmeier, 2012. "No Band Color Effects on Male Courtship Rate or Body Mass in the Zebra Finch: Four Experiments and a Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Zitan Song & Yao Liu & Isobel Booksmythe & Changqing Ding, 2017. "Effects of individual-based preferences for colour-banded mates on sex allocation in zebra finches," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1228-1235.
    3. Liam R Dougherty, 2023. "The effect of individual state on the strength of mate choice in females and males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 197-209.
    4. Ramsey, David M., 2012. "Partnership formation based on multiple traits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 624-637.
    5. E.H. DuVal & J.A. Kapoor, 2015. "Causes and consequences of variation in female mate search investment in a lekking bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1537-1547.
    6. Jagadeeswar Reddy Chintam & Mary Daniel, 2018. "Real-Power Rescheduling of Generators for Congestion Management Using a Novel Satin Bowerbird Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:5:p:1376-1383.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.