IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i1p152-164..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biparental incubation patterns in a high-Arctic breeding shorebird: how do pairs divide their duties?

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Bulla
  • Mihai Valcu
  • Anne L. Rutten
  • Bart Kempenaers

Abstract

In biparental species, parents may be in conflict over how much they invest into their offspring. To understand this conflict, parental care needs to be accurately measured, something rarely done. Here, we quantitatively describe the outcome of parental conflict in terms of quality, amount, and timing of incubation throughout the 21-day incubation period in a population of semipalmated sandpipers (Calidris pusilla) breeding under continuous daylight in the high Arctic. Incubation quality, measured by egg temperature and incubation constancy, showed no marked difference between the sexes. The amount of incubation, measured as length of incubation bouts, was on average 51min longer per bout for females (11.5h) than for males (10.7h), at first glance suggesting that females invested more than males. However, this difference may have been offset by sex differences in the timing of incubation; females were more often off nest during the warmer period of the day, when foraging conditions were presumably better. Overall, the daily timing of incubation shifted over the incubation period (e.g., for female incubation from evening–night to night–morning) and over the season, but varied considerably among pairs. At one extreme, pairs shared the amount of incubation equally, but one parent always incubated during the colder part of the day; at the other extreme, pairs shifted the start of incubation bouts between days so that each parent experienced similar conditions across the incubation period. Our results highlight how the simultaneous consideration of different aspects of care across time allows sex-specific investment to be more accurately quantified.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Bulla & Mihai Valcu & Anne L. Rutten & Bart Kempenaers, 2014. "Biparental incubation patterns in a high-Arctic breeding shorebird: how do pairs divide their duties?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 152-164.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:152-164.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art098
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. András Kosztolányi & Innes C. Cuthill & Tamás Székely, 2009. "Negotiation between parents over care: reversible compensation during incubation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 446-452.
    2. Will Cresswell & S. Holt & J. M. Reid & D. P. Whitfield & R. J. Mellanby, 2003. "Do energetic demands constrain incubation scheduling in a biparental species?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(1), pages 97-102, January.
    3. Rufus A. Johnstone & Camilla A. Hinde, 2006. "Negotiation over offspring care--how should parents respond to each other's efforts?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(5), pages 818-827, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daiping Wang & Wolfgang Forstmeier & Mihai Valcu & Niels J Dingemanse & Martin Bulla & Christiaan Both & Renée A Duckworth & Lynna Marie Kiere & Patrik Karell & Tomáš Albrecht & Bart Kempenaers, 2019. "Scrutinizing assortative mating in birds," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Martin Bulla & Will Cresswell & Anne L. Rutten & Mihai Valcu & Bart Kempenaers, 2015. "Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 30-37.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daiping Wang & Wenyuan Zhang & Shuai Yang & Xiang-Yi Li Richter, 2023. "Sex differences in avian parental care patterns vary across the breeding cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Martin Bulla & Will Cresswell & Anne L. Rutten & Mihai Valcu & Bart Kempenaers, 2015. "Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 30-37.
    3. Alfréd Trnka & Tomáš Grim, 2013. "To compensate or not to compensate: testing the negotiation model in the context of nest defense," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 223-228.
    4. Rufus A. Johnstone & Andrea Manica & Annette L. Fayet & Mary Caswell Stoddard & Miguel A. Rodriguez-Gironés & Camilla A. Hinde, 2014. "Reciprocity and conditional cooperation between great tit parents," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 216-222.
    5. Gustavo Tomás & Santiago Merino & Josué Martínez-de la Puente & Juan Moreno & Judith Morales & Juan Rivero-de Aguilar, 2013. "Nest size and aromatic plants in the nest as sexually selected female traits in blue tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 926-934.
    6. Miklós Laczi & Dóra Kötél & János Török & Gergely Hegyi, 2017. "Mutual plumage ornamentation and biparental care: consequences for success in different environments," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1359-1368.
    7. Erol Akçay & Joan Roughgarden, 2009. "The Perfect Family: Decision Making in Biparental Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-10, October.
    8. Frank Groenewoud & Sjouke A Kingma & Kat Bebbington & David S Richardson & Jan Komdeur, 2019. "Experimentally induced antipredator responses are mediated by social and environmental factors," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 986-992.
    9. Dieter Lukas, 2013. "Caring for Offspring in a World of Cheats," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-3, March.
    10. Tina A Barbasch & Rebecca Branconi & Robin Francis & Madison Pacaro & Maya Srinivasan & Geoffrey P Jones & Peter M Buston, 2021. "Negotiations over parental care: a test of alternative hypotheses in the clown anemonefish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1256-1265.
    11. James L. Savage & Andrew F. Russell & Rufus A. Johnstone, 2013. "Maternal costs in offspring production affect investment rules in joint rearing," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 750-758.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:152-164.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.