IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i1p190-197..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Movement in a selfish seal herd: do seals follow simple or complex movement rules?

Author

Listed:
  • Alta De Vos
  • M. Justin O’Riain

Abstract

The selfish herd hypothesis predicts that animals can reduce their relative predation risk by moving toward their neighbors. However, several computer simulation studies have found that smaller herds, rather than large, compact aggregations form when animals move in this manner and that larger herds are only achieved by following more complex movement rules, thought to be unrealistic for real biological systems. Despite much theoretical work, predictions on how animals move to reduce their predation risk have seldom been tested in natural systems. Here we investigate the movement patterns of fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) within 7 groups as they move through a zone of high risk to the relative safety of their foraging grounds. We assess different movement rules against all the individuals in the study and identify whether such an individual’s movement at a snapshot in time plausibly reflects a follow (1) of a rule or not (0). Our results suggest that seals traversing high predation risk areas use simple movement rules, rather than complex averaging rules, to reduce their domains of danger. Simple movement rules that serve to decrease an individual seals’ domain of danger resulted in the formation of compact groups as predicted by the selfish herd hypothesis. Importantly, individuals dropped these simple movement rules where predation risk is low, which coincided with a reduction in mean group compaction. Despite our small sample size, our results provide empirical support for the central predictions of the selfish herd hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Alta De Vos & M. Justin O’Riain, 2013. "Movement in a selfish seal herd: do seals follow simple or complex movement rules?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 190-197.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:190-197.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars153
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lesley J. Morrell & Graeme D. Ruxton & Richard James, 2011. "Spatial positioning in the selfish herd," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(1), pages 16-22.
    2. Lesley J. Morrell & Richard James, 2008. "Mechanisms for aggregation in animals: rule success depends on ecological variables," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(1), pages 193-201.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thompson, Jason & Savino, Giovanni & Stevenson, Mark, 2016. "A model of behavioural adaptation as a contributor to the safety-in-numbers effect for cyclists," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 65-75.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frédéric B. Muratori & Angéla Rouyar & Thierry Hance, 2014. "Clonal variation in aggregation and defensive behavior in pea aphids," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 901-908.
    2. Thompson, Jason & Savino, Giovanni & Stevenson, Mark, 2016. "A model of behavioural adaptation as a contributor to the safety-in-numbers effect for cyclists," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 65-75.
    3. Callum Duffield & Christos C Ioannou, 2017. "Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1283-1292.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:190-197.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.