IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v97y2015i5p1360-1370..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marketing Contracts and Crop Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoxue Du
  • Jennifer Ifft
  • Liang Lu
  • David Zilberman

Abstract

Contracts between farmers and intermediaries and crop insurers are important means for farmers to mitigate risks in modern U.S. agriculture. In this paper, we investigate the effect of crop insurance enrollment on contract terms and farmers’ participation in marketing contracts. Following Ligon (2003), we set up a mechanism design framework to demonstrate an intermediary's contract design problem, where farmers are assumed to be utility maximizing agents. We depict farmers’ optimal choices of insurance coverage using the specification developed by Babcock (2012). Our model shows that improved terms of crop insurance (lower premiums, higher subsidies) make contracts less appealing to farmers as mechanisms for mitigating risk. Therefore, intermediaries may revise their contract offers so that they are more attractive. However, improvements in contract terms are limited by their cost to the intermediaries and will not lead to expanded participation in contracts.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxue Du & Jennifer Ifft & Liang Lu & David Zilberman, 2015. "Marketing Contracts and Crop Insurance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1360-1370.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:97:y:2015:i:5:p:1360-1370.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aav024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gohin, Alex, 2017. "Macroeconomic impacts of the U.S. farm policy: a second best assessment," Conference papers 332819, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. McKendree, Melissa G.S. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Schulz, Lee L., 2021. "Management of Multiple Sources of Risk in Livestock Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 75-93, February.
    3. Alexandre Gohin, 2019. "General Equilibrium Modelling of the Insurance Industry: U.S. Crop Insurance," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 4(2), pages 108-145, December.
    4. Gohin, Alexandre, 2018. "Lessons from the U.S. risk management instruments for the future CAP," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271965, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Dongli Wu & Shan He & Lingui Qin & Jingyue Feng & Yu Gao, 2024. "Role of Policy-Supported Hog Insurance in Promoting Green Total Factor Productivity: The Case of China during 2005–2021," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:97:y:2015:i:5:p:1360-1370.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.