IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v76y1994i3p396-406..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences for Pesticide Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • John Horowitz

Abstract

I look at consumer preferences for pesticide regulation. The analysis is based on a random telephone survey of households. There is a distinct preference for pesticide regulation over an alternative risk reduction proposal (auto exhaust regulation) when both regulations are hypothesized to cost the same and save the same number of lives. Such preference has a surprisingly broad demographic base. However, when the potential numbers of lives saved are different under the two programs, almost 71% of the subjects preferred the regulation that saved the most lives regardless of the risk source.

Suggested Citation

  • John Horowitz, 1994. "Preferences for Pesticide Regulation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(3), pages 396-406.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:76:y:1994:i:3:p:396-406.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1243652
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Houndekon, Victorin A. & De Groote, Hugo, 1998. "Health Costs And Externalities Of Pesticide Use In Locust And Grasshopper Control In The Sahel," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20966, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Maria Aguiar Fontes & Eric Giraud-Héraud & Alexandra Seabra Pinto, 2013. "Consumers' behaviour towards food safety: A litterature review," Working Papers hal-00912476, HAL.
    3. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John & Liptak, Clare, 1997. "Quality of Agricultural Produce: Consumer Preferences and Perceptions," P Series 36739, Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics.
    4. Veeman, Michele M. & Adamowicz, Wiktor L., 2000. "Consumer'S Perceptions Of Environmental Risks And The Demand For Food Safety," Project Report Series 24040, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    5. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John, 1997. "Consumer Response to Integrated Pest Management and Organic Agriculture: An Econometric Analysis," P Series 36727, Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics.
    6. David F. Layton & Gardner Brown & Mark L. Plummer, 1999. "Valuing Multiple Programs to Improve Fish Populations," Working Papers 0042, University of Washington, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:76:y:1994:i:3:p:396-406.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.