IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v58y1976i4_part_1p653-662..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis of Electrical Energy Pricing and Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Noel D. Uri

Abstract

Based upon a spatial equilibrium model, this study argues that society can gain with increased regional coordination of generation and transmission activities of the U.S. electrical energy industry. In 1973 society suffered a loss in welfare because of minimal regional coordination, reflecting that consumers in regions where relatively inexpensive electrical energy was available were permitted to consume more and pay less than what would have been optimal at the expense of consumers in less efficient producing regions. The policy implications suggest that regional coordination be more actively pursued, involving the use of legislated authority by the Federal Power Commission.

Suggested Citation

  • Noel D. Uri, 1976. "A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis of Electrical Energy Pricing and Allocation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(4_Part_1), pages 653-662.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:58:y:1976:i:4_part_1:p:653-662.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1238808
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cardell, Judith B. & Hitt, Carrie Cullen & Hogan, William W., 1997. "Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 109-137, March.
    2. James Wesley Burnett & Xueting Zhao, 2017. "Spatially Explicit Prediction of Wholesale Electricity Prices," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(2), pages 99-140, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:58:y:1976:i:4_part_1:p:653-662.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.