IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v54y1972i2p209-216..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inter-Fiber Competition and the Future of the United States Cotton Industry

Author

Listed:
  • B. Smith
  • R. Dardis

Abstract

Markov analysis is employed to investigate the competitive potential of the U. S. cotton fiber industry. Cotton's market share is projected to decline in 17 of the top 20 end uses examined though at a slower rate than in the past. Non-cellulosic, the major competitor, is projected to capture more than 50 percent of the market in 13 end uses. The results indicate the necessity for concerted action by the cotton industry if it is to recapture or even retain its market share. The long time horizons of many end uses provide time for planning and implementing programs designed to improve cotton's competitive position.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Smith & R. Dardis, 1972. "Inter-Fiber Competition and the Future of the United States Cotton Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 209-216.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:54:y:1972:i:2:p:209-216.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1238703
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ethridge, Don E. & Roy, Sujit K. & Myers, David W., 1983. "Changes in the Structure of the Texas High Plains Cotton Ginning Industry, 1967-1999," Archive 259788, Texas Tech University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Ward, Lionel F. & King, Gordon A., 1973. "Interfiber Competition with Emphasis on Cotton: Trends and Projections to 1980," Technical Bulletins 158608, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:54:y:1972:i:2:p:209-216.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.