IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v47y1965i4p889-899..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The United Nations, Agriculture, and the World Economic Revolution

Author

Listed:
  • Gunnar Myrdal

Abstract

The long-held expectation that application of the technical knowledge of the developed countries in the underdeveloped countries would permit food production to increase faster than population is not being fulfilled. The use of technical knowledge to decrease the death rate in underdeveloped countries and to enable industrial nations to produce synthetic substitutes for imports from underdeveloped countries has more than offset its use to increase production in underdeveloped countries. Rather than adapting the present body of technical knowledge to conditions in the underdeveloped countries, we should encourage localized research directed specifically to the problems of these countries. Since the initial effects of industrialization in increasing the demand for labor are small, the new agricultural technology should be labor-intensive. The institutional reforms needed within the underdeveloped countries should foster the generation and adoption of such technology. Most of the needed increase in food production for the increasing population must take place in the underdeveloped countries. The critical mission of FAO to increase food production in these countries is seriously hampered by the political nature of the United Nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunnar Myrdal, 1965. "The United Nations, Agriculture, and the World Economic Revolution," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 47(4), pages 889-899.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:47:y:1965:i:4:p:889-899.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1236332
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:47:y:1965:i:4:p:889-899.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.