Author
Listed:
- Florina-Andreea STURZ
(Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)
- Roxana-Florina MOTOCA
(Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)
- Carmen SCORTE
(Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)
- Daniela ZĂPODEANU
(Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)
Abstract
Sustainability, the circular economy, and sustainable development are terms that have become increasingly prevalent in recent years, used by policymakers, the business environment, and individual consumers alike, due to the impact of these concerns on the more efficient use of resources, quality of life, and the benefits they bring to humanity both in the short and long term. Sustainability in the fashion industry has become an increasingly discussed topic in contemporary times, as consumers grow more aware of the environmental impact of clothing and of the responsibility to protect nature and limited resources. The objective of this paper is to investigate the extent to which sustainability reporting by key actors in the fashion industry reflects the genuine integration of sustainable development principles into their business strategies. The research is guided by the following research question: to what extent do sustainability practices and communication indicate an authentic transition toward a responsible business model, or, conversely, reproduce forms of superficial sustainability primarily oriented toward reputation management? The paper adopts a qualitative, theoretical–empirical approach, based on a comparative analysis of official sustainability reports published by selected companies in the fashion industry. This analysis is supported by a conceptual framework integrating academic literature on sustainability, corporate social responsibility, greenwashing, and international reporting standards. The methodology consists of a content analysis aimed at identifying and comparing the core elements of sustainability discourse within each company, with particular emphasis on the coherence of objectives, transparency of indicators, alignment with global initiatives (such as the SDGs or GRI), and the depth of implemented measures. The case study highlights similarities in the language used and the general commitments declared, while also revealing significant differences in terms of clarity, applicability, and the actual impact of these initiatives. The research findings provide a critical perspective on how companies use sustainability reporting both as a strategic tool and as a means of legitimization in the eyes of consumers and investors. The conclusions suggest the need for stricter reporting standards and independent monitoring of progress, while also emphasizing the importance of consumers’ critical literacy in evaluating the sustainability commitments promoted by fashion industry brands.
Suggested Citation
Florina-Andreea STURZ & Roxana-Florina MOTOCA & Carmen SCORTE & Daniela ZĂPODEANU, 2025.
"Sustainable Business Models In The Fashion Industry: Between Innovation And Social Responsibility,"
Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 358-372, December.
Handle:
RePEc:ora:journl:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:358-372
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- L67 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Other Consumer Nondurables: Clothing, Textiles, Shoes, and Leather Goods; Household Goods; Sports Equipment
- F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
- Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
- M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:358-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.