IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v30y2021i2p299-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ARIMA vs. MACHINE LEARNING IN TERMS OF EQUITY MARKET FORECASTING

Author

Listed:
  • Iulian-Cornel LOLEA

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ioan-Radu PETRARIU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adriana GIURGIU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania; Department of International Business, Faculty of Economic Studies, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

Through this paper we aimed to develop a comparison between ARIMA, Prophet, KNN and Neural Networks in terms of stock prices forecasting. After reviewing the literature, we noticed that there is a plethora of studies that address this problem of forecasting, but very few have made comparisons that include ARIMA, machine learning, but also the Prophet forecasting model developed by Facebook, which brought interesting results for certain data series. Based on methodologies validated by other authors, we compared these models in our paper and we sought to obtain promising results regarding performance evaluation. The comparison was made in-sample, the training period being 01/01/2010 - 31/07/2021, but also out-of-sample (01/08/2021 - 31/10/2021). The study was performed for Societe Generale’s stock, using daily observations. Statistical loss functions such as RMSE, MPE, MAPE, MAE, and ME were used for comparison. The results indicated an outperformance of Neural Networks, both in-sample and out-of-sample, this model being on the 1st place according to the aggregated score. It is also noteworthy that the ARIMA model was in second place in-sample, ahead of KNN, but for out of sample these two algorithms changed their positions. On the other hand, the Prophet algorithm performed the weakest, both in-sample and out of sample. Also, we must underlie that all four algorithms had a clear tendency to overestimate the price of Societe Generale, according to the results of the statistical loss functions ME and MPE. Finally, it should be noted that the results were consistent with what other authors found out, especially for the out-of-sample period, where the machine learning models performed best.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulian-Cornel LOLEA & Ioan-Radu PETRARIU & Adriana GIURGIU, 2021. "ARIMA vs. MACHINE LEARNING IN TERMS OF EQUITY MARKET FORECASTING," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 299-308, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:299-308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2021/n2/031.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikola MILOSEVIC, 2016. "Equity Forecast: Predicting Long Term Stock Price Movement using Machine Learning," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 288-294, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Pomorski & Denise Gorse, 2023. "Improving Portfolio Performance Using a Novel Method for Predicting Financial Regimes," Papers 2310.04536, arXiv.org.
    2. Chlebus Marcin & Dyczko Michał & Woźniak Michał, 2021. "Nvidia's Stock Returns Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques for Time Series Forecasting Problem," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 8(55), pages 44-62, January.
    3. Dushmanta Kumar Padhi & Neelamadhab Padhy & Akash Kumar Bhoi & Jana Shafi & Muhammad Fazal Ijaz, 2021. "A Fusion Framework for Forecasting Financial Market Direction Using Enhanced Ensemble Models and Technical Indicators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-31, October.
    4. Dev Shah & Haruna Isah & Farhana Zulkernine, 2019. "Stock Market Analysis: A Review and Taxonomy of Prediction Techniques," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Akhilesh Prasad & Priti Bakhshi & Arumugam Seetharaman, 2022. "The Impact of the U.S. Macroeconomic Variables on the CBOE VIX Index," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    loss functions; machine learning; autoregressive; equity markets.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:299-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.