IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2019i1p389-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

We Would Like To Be Liked – Strategies Used To Control The Impression Others Form Of Us

Author

Listed:
  • UJHELYI Mária

    (Institute of Management and Organizational Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • FILEP Roland

    (Institute of Management and Organizational Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • BARIZSNÉ HADHÁZI Edit

    (Institute of Management and Organizational Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

In the ‘Power and Politics’ chapters of Organizational Behaviour textbooks we often find a section on Impression Management (IM). This term means that people tend to influence how other people perceive them. This research field has been at the centre of interest since the 1980s. Researchers first defined the term, then explained the different forms, tactics and strategies of IM, and also developed measurement tools, which can be used to evaluate it. Its impact and connection with other behaviour variables has also been studied. In this article we will present a smaller part of our research in which we analyse the connection between Dark Triad personality factors, the perception of ethical leadership and the impression of management tactics used by university students. The research was done in the framework of an Organizational Behaviour course at the University of Debrecen’s Faculty of Economics and Business. Students were asked to fill in a questionnaire. Feedback was given to them on how to interpret the results, in order to improve their self-awareness. Then the anonymous questionnaires were collected for research purposes. Participation in the research was voluntary. In the analysis we used basic statistical methods to compare the popularity of the 22 different IM behaviours. It is possible to divide the 22 items of the questionnaire into five well differentiated IM tactics. We calculated these figures and measured if there are significant differences between IM tactics preferred by men and by women, between respondents with and without work experience and between groups of students studying in different majors. We also compared our research results with one of our previous findings, and with figures available in the international literature. The most frequently used IM tactic in our sample was ingratiation. We found a significant difference between male and female respondents in the use of self-promotion and intimidation tactics. Comparing our research result to one of our previous studies (Ujhelyi and Barizsné, 2018), we found significant differences between Hungarian and Chinese students in the use of all IM tactics, and we also obtained similar results when we compared our findings with a sample from the USA analysed by Bolino and Turnley (1999).

Suggested Citation

  • UJHELYI Mária & FILEP Roland & BARIZSNÉ HADHÁZI Edit, 2019. "We Would Like To Be Liked – Strategies Used To Control The Impression Others Form Of Us," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 389-396, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:389-396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2019/n1/040.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Impression management tactics; university students’ behaviour; international comparison.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:389-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.