IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2019i1p175-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can We Trust Accounting Result And Cash-Flow In Apreciating Financial Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • MIHALCEA Mihaela Maria

    (Department of Doctoral Accounting Studies, „1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, Romania)

  • HADA Izabela Diana

    (Department of Doctoral Accounting Studies, „1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, Romania)

Abstract

Is profit an indicator that reflects the real performance of the economic entity? Or is it rather a benchmark for uninitiated users who do not know the artificial effects of policies, options and accounting estimates on this sensitive indicator? The vulnerability of the accounting result makes us focus on the objective nature of cash flow, which is a more modern and tangible measure of performance, eliminating the effects of using different accounting treatments for the same transactions. Corroborated, the two coordinates - the accounting result and the cash flow, and more specifically those related to the operating activity - would give a better appreciation of performance. What should we understand when these indicators contradict each other? Is that possible? The case outlined in this paper demonstrates that the answer is yes. But why does this happen and how do we appreciate the performance in this case? The present paper begins by presenting some beliefs that profit is an important indicator of financial performance. These are to be combated by presenting profit margins as an indicator of financial performance, the main or the disadvantage being its subjective character. Subjectivity does not apply to cash-flow, which leads us to say that the cash-flow reflects more objectively and more accurately the financial performance of the economic entity. Further, we will analyze the two indicators in parallel and comparatively, explaining the discrepancy that may arise between them and especially the situation where the profit is positive and cash-flow is negative. Our research is both empirical and theoretical. The results of this research point out to shareholders that profits can be misleading and recomend them to make a minimum simple comparison between proft and cash-flow, between operating profits and cash-flow from operations before they risk making decisions. Increased attention should certainly be given to the situation where there is a discrepancy between the two indicators, because according to some opinions it may even be a sign of the use of creative accounting, and practice has put us, not least, in the face of bankruptcy companies with huge profits.

Suggested Citation

  • MIHALCEA Mihaela Maria & HADA Izabela Diana, 2019. "Can We Trust Accounting Result And Cash-Flow In Apreciating Financial Performance?," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 175-184, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:175-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2019/n1/017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financial performance; profit; cash flow; operating activity; shareholders; creative accounting.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:175-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.